Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site.... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

HomeSexual OffencesIndecent Images Offence Solicitors

Indecent Images Offence Solicitors

Indecent Images Lawyers: Providing Sensitive and Specialist Support to Navigate Allegations

Olliers’ team of specialist lawyers can assist if you are under investigation for indecent images offences. Our lawyers offer dedicated support and robust advice and representation.

Making an initial enquiry with our team is confidential and free of charge. We understand that it can be daunting to make contact with a firm of solicitors but our approachable team has many years of experience of dealing with allegations of indecent images. We understand that for many individuals it may be their first involvement with the criminal justice system and understand how frightening the situation may be for you. We promise not to judge and seek to work together to achieve the best outcome for you. We aim to explain the process and procedures to you in clear and unambiguous language whilst at the same understanding the anxiety you face at the situation ahead.

What are indecent images?

There is often confusion about what exactly qualifies as ‘indecent images.’ Legally, the term ‘indecent images’ covers not only indecent photographs but also videos and computer files that can be turned into images or videos. The definition of ‘indecency’ is determined by the jury, based on a widely accepted standard of what is considered acceptable. For an image to be classified as indecent, it must involve a child which is defined as anyone under the age of 18.

With the advent of the internet and social media the nature of these offences has changed over the years. The police grade indecent images from Category A (most serious) to Category C (least serious). There is a variety of legislation which covers these offences to cover where such images are simply in possession or are shared. The sentences vary depending on the categorisation and number of images.

What are the categories of indecent images?

There are three categories imposed in relation to indecent images:

  • Category A: Category A images are considered the most severe as they involve penetrative sexual activity.
  • Category B: Category B images include explicit material that is non-penetrative sexual assault and explicit sexual activity
  • Category C: category C images include explicit material involving erotic posing

What is possession of indecent images?

Possession of indecent images means that the image(s) must be in the control or custody of the individual so that they are capable of accessing or in in a position to retrieve the images(s). In addition the individual must know that they possess the image or group of images on the relevant device(s). However, knowledge of the content of these image(s)is not required.

What does ‘making’  indecent images mean?

The CPS now often seek to charge suspects with ‘making’ indecent images under s.1 (1) (a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978. Previously suspects were more likely to be charged with possession of indecent images under s.160 Criminal Justice Act 1988. Making is often misunderstood and doesn’t mean an individual ‘made’ or ‘took’ the original image. It involves the viewing of an image which results in the image being downloaded to the device on which it is viewed.

Section 1(1) (a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978 includes “to take, or permit to be taken [or to make], any indecent photograph [or pseudo-photograph] of a child”. The maximum sentence for ‘making’ an indecent image of a child is ten years imprisonment.

‘Making’ indecent images is defined as follows “to cause to exist, to produce by action, to bring about” indecent images.

The court’s interpretation of ‘making’ indecent images is broad and the following can amount to making indecent images;

  • opening an email attachment
  • downloading an indecent image
  • storing an image
  • accessing a website where an indecent image “pops up”

Click here to read more about ‘making’ indecent images.

Opening an attachment or downloading an image

An individual may make an image when they open an attachment from an email which includes an indecent image/pseudo image of a child. An individual may also be found guilty of ‘making’ an image by simply downloading such an image. The prosecution must satisfy the court that the suspect deliberately and intentionally and with knowledge knew he was ‘making’ such an image. The prosecution do not need to establish that the individual intended to save the image on his computer.

Pop ups and indecent images

Accessing a pornographic website where an indecent image ‘pops up’ can constitute ‘making’ indecent images. The court have held that it was the suspect who accessed the pornographic website in which an indecent image popped up who ‘made’ the image, rather than the person responsible for creating the website.

Those under investigation may say that a ‘pop up’ has appeared whilst watching legal pornography. For the prosecution to secure a conviction of a suspect, the court must be satisfied that whilst accessing such pornography the suspect had knowledge that such pop ups would like contain indecent images.

Knowledge of indecent images

To be convicted of ‘making’ an indecent image an individual must have the knowledge that the image is/is likely to be an indecent image or pseudo image of a child. Therefore, in order for a suspect to be convicted, the prosecution need to satisfy the court that the suspect had the knowledge that opening an email attachment, downloading or accessing a website with pop-ups containing images would be likely to be an indecent image or pseudo image of a child. 

A suspect who downloads, opens an attachment, or where an image/pseudo image pops-up using a device including a mobile phone, laptop or computer could be found guilty of ‘making’ indecent image. If the CPS can satisfy the court that this a suspect did this intentionally and with the knowledge that the image is or is likely to be an indecent image or pseudo image of a child, then the suspect could be found guilty under s.1. (1)(a) Protection of Children Act 1978.

Indecent image defences

Allegations involving indecent images are an extremely sensitive and legally complex area, requiring specialist knowledge and experience. If you are under investigation or have been charged with an offence of this nature, it is vital that you seek immediate legal advice from solicitors with expertise in defending these cases.

Under Section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, there are specific defences available, including:
  • You had a legitimate reason for possessing the image.
  • You had not seen the image, and did not know or suspect it to be indecent.
  • The image was sent to you unsolicited, and you did not keep it for an unreasonable amount of time.
With the increasing use of group chats and file-sharing platforms, it is more common than ever for individuals to receive unsolicited content, sometimes from unknown contacts. In certain cases, files may be automatically downloaded to a device without the owner’s knowledge and never actually viewed.
 
If you ever receive an unsolicited indecent image, the correct course of action is to delete it immediately and check that it has not been automatically saved to other folders or cloud storage on your device.
 
Defences based on lack of awareness or unsolicited material are not uncommon and must be handled with care and precision.
 
Another issue is that the prosecution often instruct police officers to examine the devices (rather than experts). These officers often have minimal training and sometimes struggle with the accuracy of the categorisation of the images. In order to mitigate this, the defence can instruct a suitably qualified expert who can verify/challenge the accuracy of the categorisation of the images.
 
At Olliers, our experienced solicitors will assess the evidence, take detailed instructions, and advise you on all your options. Even if a guilty plea is anticipated, effective mitigation can significantly reduce the outcome. Let our experts guide you through every stage with discretion, professionalism, and unwavering support.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and indecent images

AI-generated images of child sexual abuse are illegal. Possessing, making, and distributing indecent images of children is an offence irrespective of whether it is a real image or a pseudo-image (one created using AI or any other technology).

Prohibited images and Artificial Intelligence

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 criminalises the possession of “a prohibited image of a child”. These are non-photographic – generally cartoons, drawings, animations or similar. 
Under the Coroners and Justice Act of 2009, it is an offence to possess a prohibited image.  A prohibited image is described as one which is ‘pornographic’ and ‘grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character’. Prohibited images, however, cannot be photographs or pseudo-photographs (photos which have been amended or photo-shopped for example).  They cannot show a real-life image of a person.  They are, therefore, sketches, paintings, cartoons or any other unreal ‘depiction’ of a person. 

Have you had electronic devices (laptops and phones) seized by the police?

Few things can be more stressful for an individual than to have the several police officers attend at their home address armed with warrants for the seizure of computers, tablets and mobile phone. The police will have obtained a warrant for the seizure of equipment believed to contain indecent, prohibited or extreme pornographic material. They will be gathering evidence in connection with making and/or possessing indecent images of children and the possession of extreme pornographic material.

Attendance at a property is without warning and may take place in front of family members and be witnessed by neighbours and in some case by work colleagues. In some circumstances the police carry out an arrest, although not always. A person is frequently left in limbo, awaiting the outcome of the analysis of seized items – a process that can take between six and 12 months.

Sexual communication offences and indecent images

It is quite common for those under investigation in relation to indecent images to often have allegations of sexual communication with a child against them as well. Olliers can assist in relation to these matters as well.

How can Olliers help me if I am under investigation for indecent images?

At Olliers we regularly speak to clients who have had computer equipment and phones seized by the police. On the one hand it is a waiting game but there is still a lot that can be done.

We always ensure that we make early contact with the police. We will confirm the anticipated timeframe for the investigation with the police and obtain an assurance that any further contact will be through Olliers, ensuring that there is no embarrassment caused by a police visit to home or workplace.

We can discuss with our clients the circumstances that may have led to their material being seized. We will give our clients an opportunity to discuss any anxiety they may feel. Many want to discuss worst case scenarios and we can advise on the different offences of possessing, distributing and producing indecent images. We can also explain the different categories of offences as well as current sentencing guidelines.

Are you the parent of a young person under investigation for indecent images?

We understand that for many clients who have recently been arrested or have devices seized they may be extremely apprehensive about discussing their case with a solicitor that they have never met. We understand how anxious you may feel and that investigations impact upon the wider family and not just the individual under suspicion. We are frequently contracted in the first instance by concerned family members on behalf of a loved one including by parents in relation to their children, a partner, another family member or close family friends who are looking to instruct a criminal defence firm.

Often they are making the enquiry due to the age of their child. Sometimes it may simply be that the person accused of an offence is struggling dealing with what has happened or they may be extremely apprehensive about making the enquiry for fear of being judged due to the nature of the allegation. We are always happy to speak to parents who are making enquires on behalf of their child.

We are happy to discuss how instructing Olliers can assist with third parties and to be instructed by third parties (subject to a client confirming they are content for this to happen). In cases where a client would prefer communication to be via a third party we are happy to facilitate this subject to receiving authority from a client to do so.

Impact on the family

Often it is not the just the person accused of an offence that can be impacted by a police investigation in relation to indecent images.  The wider family will need to support the individual under investigation as a police investigation can have a huge impact on that person’s mental health. An investigation can have a huge impact on the family members themselves and we can guide and support the entire family through the process.

Neurodivergent clients

At Olliers, we frequently receive enquiries from family members seeking support for neurodiverse clients. Our firm specialises in representing neurodivergent individuals including those with autism and ADHD, and we receive referrals from across the country to assist children, young people, and adults who are either under investigation by the police or facing criminal charges in relation to indecent image offences. 

What can be done at this stage?

Olliers can assist with mitigating features, which can include;

  • previous good character and/or exemplary conduct
  • age and/or lack of maturity
  • remorse
  • mental disorder or learning disability
  • evidence of steps taken to address offending or seek help

If a client recognises that they may need help we can point them in the direction of organisations that can help at a very early stage. If a client is charged and is ultimately advised to plead guilty, evidence of any early help sought can be powerful mitigation.

Will I be charged with an offence of indecent images?

In some circumstances, images may be of low level category and we may look to argue that a prosecution is not in the public interest. This may be particularly relevant to a case where a client may have sought help for a problem and where there is other, powerful mitigation. The best time to do this is before charge but it can also be done after charge.

I have already been charged with indecent images

If you have already been charged with indecent images or received a postal requisition we advise that you seek advice and representation from a specialist solicitor on an immediate basis. We can obtain the initial evidence from the prosecution and  advise you immediately in relation to the strength of the evidence and sentencing powers available to the court.

Olliers Solicitors cover all courts across England and Wales.

Sentencing Indecent Image offences

The seriousness of the offence is primarily determined by the category of the images involved and the level of engagement, such as possession, production, or distribution.

Sentencing for indecent image offences in the UK is guided by the Sentencing Council, which provides detailed guidelines for judges to follow. These guidelines aim to ensure consistency in sentencing while allowing flexibility based on individual circumstances.

Possession of Indecent Images: The maximum sentence for possession of indecent images under section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1960 is five years in prison. For Category A images the starting point is twelve months custody with a range of 26 weeks to three years custody. For Category B images, the starting point is 26 weeks custody with sentences generally ranging from a community order to 18 months custody. For Category C images the starting point is a high-level community order with sentences ranging from a medium level community order to 26 weeks custody.

Making indecent images: The maximum sentence for making indecent images is ten years under section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978. However, the guidelines state making an image by simple downloading should be treated as possession for the purposes of sentencing.

Mitigating factors, such as an early guilty plea, mental health issues, or evidence of efforts toward rehabilitation, can reduce sentences. Olliers can assist in identifying mitigating features and collating evidence to support the same. If a client recognises that they may need help we can point them in the direction of organisations that can help. Where a client is charged and ultimately pleads guilty, evidence of any early help sought can be extremely powerful mitigation and illustrate a genuine desire to change behaviour. It can therefore be useful, in appropriate cases, to seek help during the pre-charge investigation stage itself.

Costs for specialist indecent image solicitors

If you have had computer equipment seized and are under investigation for indecent images offences, there is only extremely limited legal aid (public funding) available.  However this is a crucial time and action taken at this stage can make a fundamental difference to the outcome.  Our lawyers try to be as transparent as possible in relation to fees. We will charge fees based upon an hourly rate as agreed from the outset and provide estimates as to total likely costs.  These estimates will be regularly updated. Alternatively, we may agree a fee for representing you either in respect of a particular stage of a case or for the case in its entirety. We do not undertake such cases on a legally aided basis.

Related Articles

Related Video

Read Video Transcript

Indecent images are photos, videos or other computer data that's capable of being turned into a photo or video. To be classed as an indecent image and the image must depict a person under the age of 18.

There are three categories of indecent images. Category A is the most serious. Category A generally depicts penetrative sexual activity, category B non-penetrative sexual activity and category C erotic poses.

Indecent image investigations can be extremely stressful for an individual, the investigation itself can be quite lengthy. The investigation generally begins by police attending at your home address with a search warrant in order to seize electronic devices. They may arrest you and take you to the police station in order to interview you there and then, alternatively it may be that they simply seize the electronic devices and make arrangements to interview you on a voluntary basis at a later date. It's important to remember that you're entitled to seek legal advice and it's crucial that you speak to a Solicitor.

The police will have your electronic devices electronically analysed and that can take many months. Once the results of the forensic analysis have come back to the police it may be that they want to conduct a second interview with you to discuss the results of the analysis. Generally speaking that interview would take place on a voluntary basis. For a charging decision to be made, the police will then send their file to the Crown Prosecution Service who will then decide whether it's appropriate to bring a prosecution having regard to whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction and secondly whether it's in the public interest to prosecute you.

Indecent image investigations can be relatively lengthy the average is approximately 6 to 12 months although some investigations can be shorter and some can be much lengthier. The police will often release an individual after arrest subject to pre-charge bail for a period of up to three months initially, however that time scale will generally be extended or the individual will be released under investigation instead as the investigation is unlikely to be completed within that initial three-month period.

In some cases the images themselves may be of a relatively low level category. In those scenarios it may be feasible to seek to persuade the Crown Prosecution Service that it's not in the public interest to prosecute. This may be particularly relevant to a case where a client has accessed help during the investigative period and sought to deal with any issues, for example, a porn addiction. This can be particularly relevant where a client has relevant vulnerabilities.

It's absolutely crucial that anyone attending for an interview with the police seeks legal advice. There is meticulous preparation that can be undertaken, we can speak with the officer beforehand and obtain disclosure - essentially a summary of the evidence in relation to the case, we can discuss this with you and decide upon a strategy to be adopted for the interview.

The CPS will often charge suspects with making of an indecent image as opposed to possession of an indecent image. This may cause concern, but it doesn't mean making in the traditional sense. The court's definition of making an indecent image can include opening an email attachment, storing an image, downloading an image or accessing a website where an indecent image pops up. At Olliers, we understand that being under investigation in relation to indecent images is extremely stressful and distressing for a client. The vast majority of our clients have no prior involvement with the criminal justice system and we're here at Ollie is to guide you through every step of the process.

Recent Cases

  • Client A: Client A had a successful career. However, during the space of a few months he lost his job and his wife left him taking his children. Client A began drinking heavily and started to visiting adult forums. Unfortunately, some of the forums he visited contained indecent images. He was visited by the police and devices were seized. Client A contacted Olliers. Instructions were taken and he was signposted to professionals for help with his behaviour. Olliers established and maintained contact with the police. Client A participated in coursework and sessions to address his behaviour. Following forensic analysis of the seized devices, Olliers made representations against prosecution. Client A was not prosecuted, instead he was given a conditional caution and he is now able to move forward with his life.
  • Client B: Client B was a single man who lived alone. Over time he developed an interest in online forums and received a number of indecent images. The police attended his home address and seized devices. Following police involvement, client B approached Olliers. He was signposted to a number of agencies and undertook significant steps to address his behaviour. In the meantime, Olliers maintained constant contact with the police. Upon examination of seized material, Category C images were discovered. Representations were made based upon the circumstances of the offending and the category of the images. It was argued that it was not in the public interest for Client B to be prosecuted. We were successful and a conditional caution was given.
  • Client C: Client C was a young man who had police attend at his home address and seize his electronic devices. He took initial advice from another firm that he should simply await the result of forensics analysis of his devices and no action was required at this stage. He became increasingly anxious and spent many weeks worrying about what was likely to happen. Eventually he contacted Olliers after learning about our pro-active approach. We immediately made contact with the police for an update and continued to liaise with the officer for the duration of the case. We worked with Client C and he gained assistance from external agencies following our recommendations.  Ultimately we attended for a voluntary interview with Client C and subsequently a conditional caution was offered following our submissions to the prosecution.
  • Client D was a company director arrested in connection with revenge porn offences. It was alleged that he had uploaded a film of himself and the complainant to a porn website without the consent of the complainant. Representations were made to the police, to the effect that our client believed there was consent and that there was no intention to cause her distress. There was therefore no realistic prospect of a conviction.  Following receipt of representations, no further action was taken against our client
  • Client E: Client E was a single man who lived alone. The police attended his home address and seized various electronic devices for forensic analysis. He was then arrested and interviewed at the police station for possession of indecent images of children. Following police involvement, Client E contacted Olliers. We immediately adopted a pro-active approach and established contact with the police to enquire about the progress of their investigation. We continued to liaise with the police regularly and provide updates to Client E on where the investigation was up to. Detailed instructions were taken from him and we signposted him to specialists who could help him to address his online activity and offer support. He engaged with a specialist programme and took positive steps to deal with his issues. Once the results of the forensic analysis of the devices had been obtained, we submitted detailed representations against prosecution. This was successful – Client E was not prosecuted and was instead issued with a conditional caution.

Some Frequently Asked Questions

Why choose Olliers?

Our senior lawyers are all leaders in their field. Olliers is ranked as a top tier law firm by both the authoritative guides to the legal profession, namely the Legal 500 2025 and Chambers Guide 2025. We are a Times Best Law Firm 2025. We are the Manchester Legal Awards 2024 Crime Team of the Year retaining the title from 2023, an award we have won seven times since 2011.

Contact our indecent image offences lawyers

Please contact our new enquiry team on 020 3883 6790 (London) or 01618341515 (Manchester), by email to info@olliers.com or complete the form below if you would like to arrange a confidential discussion as to how Olliers can assist you if you are under investigation for indecent images offences.

Complete the form below and we will contact you

Contact Us 2025
Where possible we prefer to discuss recommendations with you over the phone, will this be possible?
What is the best time to call?
Are there any police bail dates, court dates, interviews or other deadlines that you are aware of?
Do you have any legal professionals already instructed?

Manchester

Head Office

London

Satellite Office