Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site.... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

The use of computer evidence in court

Written 28th January 2025 by Eleanor Harris

A press release from the Ministry of Justice has announced that the role of computer evidence in the criminal justice system will be examined through a call for evidence which launched on Tuesday 21st January 2025.

What is a call for evidence?

A call for evidence is an information-gathering exercise that seeks expertise from people, organisations and stakeholders with knowledge of a particular issue.

What is the current law?

Prior to 2000, the admissibility of computer evidence was dependent on whether it could be established if there was improper use of the computer, or that at all material times the computer was operating properly. After 2000, it was replaced with a common law (rebuttable) presumption that the computer was operating correctly at the material time. The presumption is a rebuttable one, meaning that if it can be shown that the software may not have been functioning correctly, the burden shifts to whoever is seeking to rely on the evidence to prove that it was.

Why a call for evidence?

In this instance, the call for evidence will last 3 months (open until 15th April 2025), with the intention that any proposed reforms will be informed by all available evidence. This has been enacted following the wrongful convictions of hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters in the Post Office Horizon scandal, which highlighted that there are potential dangers in the default position of assuming that a computer is correct. This assumption may lead to miscarriages of justice on a large scale, especially where this allows for a computer system used on a large scale to evade criticism.

Since the introduction of the rebuttable presumption, what constitutes digital material has evolved significantly, and the call for evidence seems particularly relevant given the swiftly evolving use of technology, including the increasing use of artificial intelligence. Therefore, it is important that the role of these more novel technologies that fall under computer evidence are open to scrutiny.

What does the call for evidence invite comment upon?

In the Horizon Post Office scandal, the failure to investigate properly meant that there were barriers to challenging this rebuttable presumption. Perhaps the call for evidence will reform the law in order to eliminate barriers to challenging said presumption, specifically by asking the following question that the call has welcomed answers and opinions on:

“1) The current common law (rebuttable) presumption is that computers producing evidence were operating correctly at the material time.

  • (a) Is this presumption fit for purpose in modern criminal prosecutions?
  • (i) Please specify why you gave this answer
  • (b) How easy or difficult do you believe it is at present for this presumption to be effectively rebutted?
  • (c) What barriers do you see in effectively rebutting this presumption?”

This expert review therefore aims to help build on the government’s efforts to restore public confidence in the criminal justice system. The call for evidence is open to the views of “all those with an interest in this area of criminal procedure,” thus with such a wide scope, it will almost certainly provide further insight into the use of computer evidence.

Olliers Solicitors – specialist criminal defence lawyers

Olliers is ranked as a top tier law firm by both the authoritative guides to the professions, namely the Legal 500 2025 and Chambers Guide 2025. We are a Times Best Law Firm 2025. We are the Manchester Legal Awards 2024 Crime Team of the Year retaining the title from 2023, an award we have won seven times since 2011.

We have a formidable reputation for our pro-active approach to the investigative stage of a criminal case focusing on crisis management, discretion and nipping an investigation in the bud. We are known for our creative and dynamic attitude to problem solving offering a tailored approach to every case.

Olliers specialise in defending large scale and complex serious criminal cases. Nationally, few firms can match our experience and expertise.

If you need a specialist criminal defence lawyer please contact us by telephone on 0161 8341515 (Manchester) or 020 38836790 (London), by email to info@olliers.com or complete the form below.

Eleanor Harris

Trainee Solicitor

Manchester

Head Office

London

Satellite Office

If you would like to contact Olliers Solicitors please complete the form below

Contact Us 2025
Where possible we prefer to discuss recommendations with you over the phone, will this be possible?
What is the best time to call?
Are there any police bail dates, court dates, interviews or other deadlines that you are aware of?
Do you have any legal professionals already instructed?