Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site.... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

New Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate Manslaughter, Health and Safety and Food Safety

Written 6th November 2015 by Olliers Solicitors

The tabloid press have, in the past, highlighted health and safety regulation gone mad, wrapping us up in cotton wool and stopping autumn conkers games. However, when injury occurs due to a business’ deliberate acts or a restaurant’s hygiene puts us at risk of illness we all wish to see the property enforcement of the law.

Sentencing Criminal Offences

On the 3rd November the sentencing council published new definitive guidelines for use in England and Wales on health and safety offences, as well as corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences.  These guidelines will apply to those over 18 who are sentenced by the courts on or after the 1st February 2016. Once in force these guidelines will apply regardless of the date of the offence.

These criminal offences do not often appear in the courts but can carry heavy penalties due to the harm or risk of harm caused. The law is complex and legal advice is essential for the consideration of plea and if a conviction follows for guidance through the sentencing process to achieve the best outcome.

Sentencing guidelines are developed to help judges and magistrates decide upon the sentence for those convicted or criminal offences. The guidelines provide a framework for sentencers to work with. A thorough knowledge of the guidelines enables advocates to properly advise and represent their clients.

The maximum penalty for these offences is fixed by statue created by parliament. The guidelines are produced to help ensure that courts across England and Wales have a consistent approach. This does not mean that defendants receive the same sentence; each defendant will be sentenced according to the particular features of their case and personal mitigation. For the offences covered here the offender will sometimes be an organisation rather than an individual and therefore the sentence can vary widely dependent upon the nature of the institution.

Sentencing – Corporate Manslaughter

The guidelines take sentencers through a series of issues in an ordered manner as can be seen in the guidance for the offence of corporate manslaughter. The maximum penalty is an unlimited fine but step one is to assess seriousness. Very obviously the consequence is serious but elements such as how foreseeable the fatality was and whether recognised standards have been followed should be noted to determine the category of offence. Step two directs the court to focus on the organisation’s annual turnover to reach a starting point which is then adjusted up or down depending on aggravating and mitigating factors such as the exploitation of vulnerable victims or a good health and safety record. Next, at step three, the court must look at the proportionality of the proposed fine to the overall means of the offender. This however is not the end of the assessment. In six more stages the court must also take account of such factors as the impact of the proposed fine on the ability to improve conditions in the organisation and on employment of staff, any reduction for a guilty plea and linked issues of remediation and compensation. The court must then look at whether the sentence is just and has a duty to give reasons and explain the effect of the sentence.

Sentencing Council member Michael Caplain QC said:

“These guidelines will introduce a consistent approach to sentencing, ensuring fair and proportionate sentences for those who cause death or injury to their employees and the public or put them at risk. These offences can have very serious consequences and it is important that sentences reflect these.”

Olliers Solicitors – Specialist Criminal Defence Lawyers

Written by Martha Whitehead, Solicitor. Martha specialises in the defence of allegations of sexual offending, large scale MTIC/carousel fraud, money laundering and drugs operations. She utilises a consistent approach to detail, the ability to analyse large volumes of data,  and the ability to work with a variety of other professionals to present clear advice to clients.

If you would like to contact Olliers Solicitors please complete the form below

Contact Us 2025
Where possible we prefer to discuss recommendations with you over the phone, will this be possible?
What is the best time to call?
Are there any police bail dates, court dates, interviews or other deadlines that you are aware of?
Do you have any legal professionals already instructed?